TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Being an Expert (was:I'm taking my marbles and going home...)
Subject:Re: Being an Expert (was:I'm taking my marbles and going home...) From:Jo Francis Byrd <jbyrd -at- byrdwrites -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:23:25 -0500
And sometime it's not even the "hard" or "soft" skills....
True story: Last week I interviewed for a job. Was quite ambivalent
about it; the job description indicated they wanted a senior level tech
writer but they were offering a barely out of school, still wet behind
the ears entry-level salary. I mentioned my reservations about the
company to the head hunter (and he was a head hunter rather than a
recruiter), and he assured me the salary range was a result of ignorance
on the part of the company - they had never had a tech writer, had only
just discovered the species even existed - and not a deliberate effort
to exploit the current buyer's market.
So, I went. The interview lasted four and a half hours. Their interview
process consisted of interviewing with the HR gnome...er...person,
taking a writing test - in pencil - interviewing with the company
president, and if you made that first cut, you'd come back and do a
short presentation so they could judge your training skills. They
planned to call the candidates on the short list that night. They needed
someone who possessed the skill set, would fit into the company
environment - and would stay.
Fortunately, a situation arose that prevented me from doing any
preparations on a presentation, because the phone call never came. I
figured I hadn't, for whatever reason, made the short list.
Turns out, there WAS no short list. The next morning I saw an e-mail
from the headhunter, time stamped the night before (at 7:30ish, to be
exact), that they had made someone an offer, please call him. My
reaction surprised me: I wasn't disappointed, not even a "rats!" or
"oh, well." Obviously I didn't really want it! :-/
I figured they'd pretty well made up their minds before I walked in the
door, but no. The last person they interviewed (they were interviewing
another when I left and one more person was coming after him), agreed to
take the job at that appalling salary - and they KNEW it was appalling,
because I told them that I understood them they wanted/needed a senior
level tech writer, and this is the salary range for that expertise
level. A mid-level tech writer should command "x" salary range. The
salary range they offered was for a barely out of school, still wet
behind the ears, entry-level. I figured that even if I didn't get the
job - and I wasn't sure I wanted it - I could help someone else.
I have no doubt the person who agreed to that offer was desperate, and I
am not criticizing that person in any way. However, I learned more about
that company from those few words from the head hunter than that company
EVER wants me to know. Despite all claims to the contrary, they are not
ethical, not when they deliberately take advantage of someone in dire
straits. They may call it a sound business decision. I call it unethical
and despicable. And I hope, very much, that person keeps looking, finds
something at twice the salary in a month or so and tells them to take
their job and shove it and leaves them in a bind (yes, I have a touch of
vindictiveness in my psychological makeup). They may have gotten the
skill set they wanted, they may even have found a person who will fit
into the environment - temporarily, at least - but they sure didn't get
anyone who will stay unless that person is a real idiot.
Jo Byrd
letoured -at- together -dot- net wrote:
FWIW, Most organizations don't admit it -- some aren't even conscious of doing it -- but they hire people to fit a family of jobs. Who gets hired often depends on as much on how a person fits with the job skills of others on the team. And people are often hired as much for the soft-skills that come out during an interview, as anything else.
Check out the new release of RoboDemo, our easy-to-use tutorial software.
Plus, buy RoboHelp Office in August and save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Get details and download free trial versions at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.