RE: Survey of Tech Writing Personality Types

Subject: RE: Survey of Tech Writing Personality Types
From: rbilbao -at- us -dot- amadeus -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:23:28 -0400


David Downing said:
In trying to respond to this, I find what a number of other folks have
found -- that in each of the four dichotomies defined for the test, I
have some aspects of one and some aspects of the other -- and that I may
shift from one pole to the other, depending on the situation. For
example, I tend toward the judging when I'm sure I know everything there
is to be known about a situation, and toward the perceiving pole

>From what I understand, the 16 types in the Myers/Briggs test are simply
preferences. A person can display characteristics from different types but will
usually have a preference for one over another. That preference can be very
extreme or very subtle. Also, through social conditioning a person can learn to
mask his or her preference consciously or unconsciously. Preferences are also
known to change with age.

I seem to recall that the end result of this test is no supposed to be a
simple four-letter classification, but rather a point on a grid that
shows where you are in relation to others. (It seems like it would have
to be a four-dimensional grid, and so would have to exist purely inside
a computer as a four-dimensional array.)

The test I took gave a score for each of the four letters. The higher the
number, the higher the preference.

Contrary to what one other poster stated, I think the test CAN serve as
a measure of compatibility -- or at least explain why some people can't
come to any sort of agreement on certain issues If two people are at
oppite ends of one of the dimensions, they're bound to see things
differently.

I agree completely. That was one of the reasons we decided to take the test
here. It helped our team understand each other more, and respect each other's
preferences.
Rhina




**********************************************************************
This email message and information contained in or attached to this message
may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure and is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient any retransmission, dissemination, printing or other use of,
or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited.
If you received this message in error, please immediately inform the sender by
reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. This footnote also
confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the
presence of computer viruses. Thank you.
**********************************************************************



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Buy ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 6.0, the most powerful SINGLE SOURCE HELP
AUTHORING TOOL for MS Word. SAVE $100 on the full version and $50 on the
upgrade. Offer ends 10/31/2002 (code: DTH102250).
http://www.componentone.com/d2hlist1002

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: wording for training materials
Next by Author: RE: Need SME Review? Try this.
Previous by Thread: RE: Survey of Tech Writing Personality Types
Next by Thread: Thesis Project


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads