RE: Dumb warnings

Subject: RE: Dumb warnings
From: "Nancy Kaminski" <nancy -dot- kaminski -at- spanlink -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:56:46 -0600


> >The official term is autoasphyxiation.

Isn't it "autoerotic asphyxiation?" Or people doing this for, er, other
sorts of thrills?

Nancy Kaminski
nancy -dot- kaminski -at- spanlink -dot- com


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Frame & Excel...How do I?
Next by Author: RE: Styles for multi-level bulleted lists
Previous by Thread: RE: Dumb warnings
Next by Thread: RE: Dumb warnings


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads