TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:When is a competition not even a competition From:"Mark L. Levinson" <nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 06 Nov 2002 13:32:45 +0200
Bruce writes:
> Another problem is that the more competitions there are, the less
> winning means. (...) winning a regional competition may be something
> to be pleased or proud about, but the accomplishment is diminished
> by the number of other winners.
Actually the term "competition" is a near-misnomer for this
annual STC undertaking. What the STC judges do is weigh each
entry against the criteria and then award each entry a
certificate of distinction, excellence, or merit (or no certificate
at all) according to how each entry stacks up, independently of
all the others. In a small competition, it can happen-- and
it has, in my experience-- that all the entries get an award
of some kind or that none of the entries at all gets an award.
The judges do have an option to give a "best of show" award to
one of the entries that they've deemed distinguished, if they
wish, but it's only an option and certainly not what people
(in my experience) enter for. People are hoping for a
certificate of some kind and they're hoping for useful
comments from the judges. (Each entrant gets the detailed
evaluations prepared by three different judges for the specific
entry.)
So I don't think that the number of competitions dilutes the
value of the awards, with the small exception of "best of show."
I do think that in an ideal world, the undertaking would be
called an Evaluation rather than a Competition, but it's hard
to get people excited about evaluations...
Mark L. Levinson
Herzlia, Israel
nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.