TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
InDesign is a new PageMaker. It was developed by the same people to be
the next product. It represents the culmination of PageMaker's
evolution, plus all the knowledge aquired along the way. It's
architecture as a product is downright revolutionary, with a sort of
central scrutinizer that manages a collection of plugins. A truly
modular product. The developers were free to implement the latest in
rendering/typographic technology, and are free to update that as the
technology improves. They have moved the code-obsolesence bar from the
technology used to present and process the data, to the technology used
to communicate between processes on the OS. From that standpoint,
InDesign is a remarkable product.
I personally have little or no use for the major features that have been
built into InDesign... I write the stuff that FrameMaker is good at.
But by all accounts InDesign is superior to anything else out there for
its particular arena. What it lacks is market penetration, and perhaps
tools. I suspect that's a matter of time. And yes, to date it is not a
FrameMaker-like tool. It is aimed more at Magazine/Newspaper work.
However, it does include an XML/Structure View plugin that bears
investigation. There is nothing to keep people from turning InDesign
into a FrameMaker competitor except the business case. You could go so
far as to turn off significant portions of the product just to focus on
the long-doc issues. But for this year and the next at least,
FrameMaker will still command everybody's attention in its particular arena.
I *still* don't think it is yet a good choice over
Frame for documentation, though, although for
marketing and advertising things it'd be extremely
good.
Oh jeez. Just what we need. A FrameMaker redone for Quark users.
I'm gonna have nightmares about this.
I know, I know, it's all idle speculation at this point. I'll just keep
repeating that to myself: idle speculation, idle speculation, idle
speculation ...
--
Chris Despopoulos, maker of CudSpan Freeware...
Plugins to Enhance FrameMaker & FrameMaker+SGML http://www.telecable.es/personales/cud/
cud -at- telecable -dot- es
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Order RoboHelp X3 in November and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.