Re: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style)

Subject: Re: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style)
From: Anthony Davey <ant -at- ant-davey -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:48:56 +0000


Flattery will get you <everywhere/nowhere>...

Anita Legsdin wrote:

Obviously, no one on this list is over 30... :-)







^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

Order RoboHelp X3 in November and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style): From: Anita Legsdin

Previous by Author: Re: Documenting for the non-typical user? WAS: Fields arranged as a s entence
Next by Author: Re: Documenting for the non-typical user? WAS: Fields arranged as a sentence
Previous by Thread: RE: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style)
Next by Thread: Re: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads