TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Preparation for a phone screen interview From:John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:48:45 -0500
Thanks, Gary. This is pretty much along my way of thinking
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary S. Callison [mailto:huey -at- interaccess -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:51 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: Preparation for a phone screen interview
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> wrote:
> Andrew Plato [mailto:gilliankitty -at- yahoo -dot- com] wrote:
> > "John Posada" wrote...
> > | I said my obligation was to get the job. You said my obligation is
> > | to be honest. I'm not there to spill my guts. I'm there to get the
> > | job. Being honest means telling them good AND bad things about me,
> > | even if it will hinder my chances at the job. I just won't discuss
> > | bad things, because I'm not obligated to tell EVERYTHING, only
> > | what I want them to know.
> So its okay for the employer to return the favor and not tell you
> everything about the job as well, right?
> I expect that to happen and every job I DID get, found out there was
> stuff going on that wasn't revealed during the interview.
...
Two of those three also contained _huge_ 'gotchas' that weren't mentioned
anywhere in the interview process. I agree with John: the object of the
interview is twofold: the company wants to convince me that they're the
right company for me, and I want to convince the company that I'm the
right guy for them. 'Honesty' is orthagonal to this. Honesty may work, or
it may not. If I ask "Why does your company succeed where others fail?"
and the honest answer is "Because we let our clients abuse and infuriate
our staff like no other company will", the honest answer isn't going to
help the cause of convincing me to work there. Similarly, if the company
asks "What is your biggest failing?" and the honest answer is "I have a
tendency to mock those who ask cliched interview questions, BONEHEAD",
that probably isn't going to help me any either.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.
Order RoboHelp X3 today and receive a $100 mail in rebate and a FREE
WebHelp Merge Module for merging multiple Help systems on any desktop
or server. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.