TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Preparation for a phone screen interview From:John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:44:52 -0500
Let me pose a question.
During the interview, you are aware that the company is very TOOLS oriented
(based on their description of the position) and are asked if you can create
flow charts using ABC Flowcharter, which you've never used. You are a wiz
with Visio and you heard from someone you respect that "If you know Visio,
ABC Flowcharter is similar".
So...when you are asked "Can create flow charts using ABC Flowcharter", do
you say"
1) Yes
2) I don't know
3) I've never used ABC flowcharter, but I'm good at learning tools and I
think I can pick it up quickly.
Now...my take on honesty is to pick #1, even though I'm thinking #3. I know
I can do it, even though I haven't before. Am I lying? I don't think so...in
fact, I think I'm being honest. The question wasn't "Have I used it.", even
though I kinda know what they mean. OTOH, the honesty purist might take door
#3 and hope that the interviewer hasn't heard this explanation before and
the person they hired fell on their face.
------
>Here is where the apparent dispute lies: Sean Brierley
>asked, "in an interview, don't both sides have an
>obligation to be honest?" You and John Posada have
>been addressing the related but separate issue of
>whether or not you can *expect* both sides to be
>honest.
>
>The way I see it, both viewpoints are correct: both
>sides *do* have an obligation to be honest, but
>expecting that obligation to be respected 100% is unrealistic.
--------------------
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Barnes&Noble.com
jposada -at- book -dot- com
212-414-6656
icq: 178047452
aim: jposada1
"When you only have two minutes to do
something that takes three, wait until you have three"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.
Order RoboHelp X3 today and receive a $100 mail in rebate and a FREE
WebHelp Merge Module for merging multiple Help systems on any desktop
or server. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.