TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Brainteasers as hiring indicator (was Re: Bringing "Mental Gymnast" back On Topic)
Subject:Re: Brainteasers as hiring indicator (was Re: Bringing "Mental Gymnast" back On Topic) From:Lois Patterson <skycerulean -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:44:11 -0800 (PST)
--- Steven Brown <stevenabrown -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> Brainteasers like the one we've hashed around today
> are fun (and f-ing frustrating!), but a better use
> of
> the limited time spent in an interview is discussion
> of the real-world challenges that technical writers
> face. That might include an assessment of the
> applicants' subject matter expertise, familiarity
> with
> technology, work style, whether they use serial
> commas
> (kidding).
Yes, but brainteasers can indicate whether the person
has mental agility and whether he can explain a
complex or tricky answer clearly. The type of tech
writing that the prospective employer requires may
indicate whether brainteasers would be a useful
screening tool.
> If brain teasers ARE going to be used, they better
> be
> 1) administered by HR so that they don't reduce the
> amount of time the hiring manager spends with
> applicants,
In the scenarios discussed so far, the brainteasers
were to be answered in an attachment to the cover
letter. They could also be asked in an interview
situation. A thought-out written response (with no
time limit and no limit on people you can ask) will
obviously be different than an extemporaneous
response, of course.
and 2) be thoroughly tested so that
> there's absolutely no ambiguity in the way the
> brainteaser can be approached and answered.
Part of the brainteaser could be that the applicant is
able to discern issues of ambiguity and point these
out in his or her response.
Lois Patterson
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Help Authoring Seminar 2003, coming soon to a city near you! Attend this
educational and affordable one-day seminar covering existing and emerging
trends in Help authoring technology. See http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2.
A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.