TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Educational areas to pursue From:GeneK <gene -at- genek -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:50:06 -0800
As a manager, I have always authorized reimbursement or PO payment for any
class that I send
an employee to because I think it will enhance that person's value to me
(and as I said previously,
when I "suggest" to an employee of mine that they would benefit from taking
a particular class, it's
"sending them"), and have them schedule the class during office hours with
the proviso that they
need to plan their class time for upcoming slow times in their project
schedules because they still
need to meet all their deadlines (the exception to this is if I'm sending
them for a specific project
and the need is urgent). If they prefer to take evening or weekend classes
for their convenience,
that's up to them, but they're salaried so there's no OT. If an employee
comes to me with a class
they'd like to take, if it isn't immediately obvious to me that the class
will enhance their value to me,
I ask them how they think it relates to their work. I'm pretty liberal
about accepting their answers
(if they've taken any time time at all to think of a way the class relates,
chances are I'll take it), and
the scheduling and timing is on the same basis as classes I send them
to. All of the above applies
to direct employees only, I've never been with a company that would spring
for any kind of training
for contractors except for mandated internal safety orientations.
Gene Kim-Eng
At 07:13 PM 2/25/2003 +0100, Jan Henning wrote:
There are arguments for the company paying for the time as well as for
them not paying. In the end, I suspect it is impossible to make general
statements about all such trainings regarding whether the company should
pay or not. Different arrangements are likely appropriate depending on the
exact circumstances.
LAST CHANCE for this steal of a deal! Purchase RoboHelp X3 by February 28
and receive $100 mail-in rebate and FREE WebHelp Merge Module ($339 value)!
RoboHelp, the Industry Standard in Help Authoring, has won over 55 industry
awards. For more information please visit: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2.
"RoboHelp X3 is simply remarkable." - George Bell, Techno-Vision Systems
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.