TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
FW: Looking for suggestions for Link Checking Software
Subject:FW: Looking for suggestions for Link Checking Software From:John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 5 May 2003 16:35:15 -0400
Does that GB include the images or just html text?
I used FP2002 for a corporate site that was big enough that it took 3 hours
over a network connection to download to local with graphics excluded (html
only) and I couldn't fit it on a CD. Is that big enough?
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Barnes&Noble.com
jposada -at- book -dot- com
NY: 212-414-6656
Dayton: 732-438-3372
"There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream
of things that never were, and ask why not?"
-----Robert Francis Kennedy, 1968 presidential campaign
> Does anybody have any suggestions on a very robust
> link-checking application
> for a very large (30gb) web site? The site is comprised
> almost entirely of
> HTML pages generated from FrameMaker-to-WebWorks
> Publisher-to-HTML. The only
> web publishing tool other than WWP that I've seen here (I'm a
> contractor) is GoLive.
>
> Anyhow, the site (especially the Archives) have thousands of
> broken links.
> But they don't have a tool that can scan the entire site quickly and
> accurately (or affordably). I use DreamWeaver for all of the Web site
> creation/maintenance/managment projects that I've done in the
> past, but none
> where nearly this size or this much of a mess. I don't think
> DreamWeaver's
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.