TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: How Many Trees? (WAS: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue)
Subject:RE: How Many Trees? (WAS: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue) From:"Gillespie, Stephen (Contractor)" <Stephen -dot- Gillespie -at- Persnet -dot- Navy -dot- Mil> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 5 May 2003 15:52:39 -0500
Mark Baker replies to my post with a false analogy:
<No. The fact that one act may violate three different standards of behavior
does not mean that those standards of behavior are not distinct from each
other.
If I drive at high speed across an interternational border with an expired
driver's licence and a trunk full of cocaine while shooting the border
guards, I am guilty of several crimes:
* speeding
* driving without a license
* drug trafficking
* smuggling
* murder
One act involved all these crimes, but speeding and murder are still
entirely different issues.>
OK, I guess it depends on how you define 'distinct' (says Steve, who by now
is reminded of the ancient proverb: "A word to the wise is sufficient, but
to the foolish, a million, is useless." ;-)
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.