TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I've searched both the techwr-l archives and microsoft.public.word.numbering
for an answer to this question, but I didn't find anything.
So, here goes:
Using advice from microsoft.public.word.numbering, I linked the numbered
heading styles in my Word document template to a specific outline-numbered
list template (1. for Heading1, 1.1 for Heading2, etc). This avoids the
common problem of Word using multiple numbered-list templates for the same
style. But I have a large manual comprised of six Word files, and the
outline-list template approach doesn't seem to work well over multiple
files. If I want to start the numbering for my first Heading2 in the
*second* manual file at something other than 1.1, (e.g. "3.7"), the only way
I've found to do it is to edit the outline-list template and restart it at
"3.7". This isn't really a fix, however, because changing it makes the
subsequent heading numbering incorrect. And if I go to fix the subsequent
numbering, I end up with *two* outline-numbered list templates for the same
heading style, which we all know is a disaster waiting to happen.
My solution for this particular manual has been to use SEQ-field numbering
for headings, since the SEQ field is reliable and very easy to reset to
whatever numbers you need. But if I use SEQ for my heading numbers instead
of a Word outline-numbered list template, I lose some of the niceties and
ease-of-use that comes with the Word-numbered headings.
Everything I've read so far leads me to believe that using SEQ is the way to
go for reliable and customizable numbering over multiple documents, but I
thought I'd ask here just in case....is there any way to do this using
Word's numbering?
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.