TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: What to look for in a technical editor From:"Bill Swallow" <wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Sun, 18 May 2003 09:22:45 -0400
Exactly. No, you're not missing something. In cases where you are writing
for an extremely technical audience, they will more than not read right over
the grammatical goof and absorb the correctly-written technical information.
Bill Swallow
wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com
::: -----Original Message-----
::: An editor encounters an ungrammatical and therefore ambiguous and
::: therefore logically meaningless string of words (not technically a
::: sentence). The editor moves a comma, rendering the string
::: of words into
::: a well-formed sentence that has an unambigous meaning.
::: This, somehow,
::: causes text that was formerly technically correct to become
::: technically
::: incorrect. Therefore, Bill and you conclude, the reader is
::: better served
::: by the unedited text.
:::
::: Am I missing something?
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.