TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: What to look for in a technical editor From:"Smith, Martin" <martin -dot- smith -at- encorp -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 19 May 2003 15:49:52 -0600
Regarding what to look for in a technical editor Andrew Plato wrote
"...Direct knowledge of the product is of PRIMARY importance. It is
impossible to intelligently edit any complex technical or user manual
without experience with the subject matter..."
One of my favorite examples of Andrew's point is that of an editor who
insisted on "correcting" all of the spelling errors in a source code
listing. The alleged spelling errors were not in the comments. The editor
couldn't understand why the source code wasn't written in plain English.
Another big potential trouble area involves units of measurement. Without
knowledge of the subject matter the editor cannot reliably ensure the
accuracy of units such as 10ms versus 10us / 10kHz versus 10MHz, etc.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.