TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I perform content review slightly different. For most of my FM content, I
extract data from a set of Excel/Access files. Right now, I'm up to over 20
databases of information. It is these files that I continuously request
review. Most like the review done this way because they can take the data
and manipulate it through SQL queries against real-time data and/or
configurations files. In return, I get a review on a single set of data that
I use to create multiple subsets of content throughout the documentation.
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Barnes&Noble.com
jposada -at- book -dot- com
NY: 212-414-6656
Dayton: 732-438-3372
"There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream
of things that never were, and ask why not?"
-----Robert Francis Kennedy, 1968 presidential campaign
> What you're talking about here is butt coverage. And I ain't talking
> about capri pants. When I send out a document to development
> for review
> (and I endeavour to ensure there's time in the development
> schedule for
> reviewing docs), I include a disclaimer, which reads something like
> this:
>
> Please review the following document for technical accuracy and send
> your comments to us by <date x>. If you cannot review this document by
> <date x>, please notify us as soon as possible. If we don't hear from
> you by <date x>, the document will be assumed to be 100%
> accurate as is.
>
> This tends to emphasize to reviewers whose court the
> responsibility ball
> sits in. Cheers. DB.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.