TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Editor's Eyes - Signs of the times From:John Fleming <johntwrl -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Sun, 25 May 2003 20:47:45 -0600
On Sun, 25 May 2003 22:11:19 -0400, in bit.listserv.techwr-l Doc
wrote:
> $On Sun, 25 May 2003 19:28:25 -0600, John Fleming
> $<johntwrl -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> $|As the old saying goes, "Latin is a dead language, as dead as it
> $|can be. First it killed the Romans, and now it's killing me."
> $|We can't expect an editor with no background in either Latin or
> $|the Ordinary of the mass to know that 'Lamb of God' is Agnus Dei,
> $|and not Angus Dei, can we?
> $
> $Well, if we excoriate technical writers for not having sufficient
> $background in the technology ... shouldn't we also expect editors of
> $religious material to have some basis in what they're writing about?
I don't disagree with your point.
And settings of the Agnus Dei are common enough that I would
expect a competent music editor who does church music to pick up
on the error.
On the technical writing front, my own experience tells me that a
techmical writer with more background and knowledge in a field or
industry will have a definite advantage over a technical writer
who doesn't.
Such a writer should be able to do a writing job faster, and with
greater quality.
A couple of years ago I did a contract job documenting utility
billing systems. I remember one SME being surprised at how fast
we covered some of the material. We covered material in one
afternoon that she'd spent three days on with a previous writer.
I suspect the difference is that I originally trained in
engineering with a utility focus. In my case, there were things
I already knew and understood. My SME didn't need to teach it to
me.
> $Mind you, I only advance the argument Platonically. I have no doubt
> $that it was a typo. After all:
OK. Still, that's why we have multiple reviews. It's to catch
things like that.
> $To err is human, to forgive bovine.
Mooooo. <smile>
--
John Fleming
Technical Writer
Edmonton, Alberta
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.