TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
You're SUPPOSED to have good communication skills if you're a tech writer
Subject:You're SUPPOSED to have good communication skills if you're a tech writer From:Andrew Plato <gilliankitty -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 26 May 2003 19:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
"Michael West" wrote...
> If *anything* should be obvious to an attentive reader
> of this list, it is that writing well -- clearly, precisely,
> concisely -- is not something that many people do
> most of the time, even among those who claim
> professional qualifications in the field.
Sooooo...what does that mean. Tech writers should stop learning about
technology so they can spend time worried about what they should already know?
<analogy>
If a doctor comes in the examination room and proudly proclaims "I have a lot
of training with medicine!" as if that was some accomplishment, I'd get up and
walk away from him.
However, if I went to see a neurologist and he proudly proclaimed "I have an
exceptional amount of experience with brain tumors!" I might sit and listen to
him (especially since this thread is giving me a brain tumor.)
</analogy>
A doctor can't even get out of med school without being exceptionally skilled
with medicine. Only after med school (or in the latter years) does a doctor
specialize in something where he can start selling him/herself as an expert.
How then is writing any different. A writer who proudly proclaims he/she is a
good writer is like a doctor saying he understands medicine. YOU"RE SUPPOSED TO
HAVE GOOD COMMUNICATION SKILLS IF YOU CALL YOURSELF A WRITER!
There is not prestigious, amazing, or even praiseworthy of a writer proudly
proclaiming he/she can write. In fact, I am a little suspicious of writers who
are amazed with their writing skills.
So Michael, I realize you (and others) are very proud of your communication
skills and want to put them out front and the A-number-1 skill employers should
consider. But writing skill is not what differentiates one writer from the
next. We're ALL writers and we ALL (presumably) have good communication skills.
What makes you a GOOD writer is what you lump on top of those communication
skills...namely technology skills and critical analysis skills.
And I would say, a writer with bad communication skills, isn't a writer. And a
technical writer without technical skills, isn't a technical writer.
Now, get back to work, you!
Andrew Plato
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.