TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Term for elegant, efficient, tight code? From:dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Sun, 01 Jun 2003 11:18:00 -0700
(Eric, please let me know if this is the thread you feel has gotten off-track.)
Michael West wrote:
>
> Doc didn't say they were sufficient -- he said they were necessary.
Maybe it's a question of interpretation.
He said:
...successful compilation, successful operation, and
efficiency are required for code or any other solution
to be considered "elegant".
I took that to mean "These are the requirements for elegant code. If it meets these requirements, it's elegant."
I didn't think of it in terms of Aristotelian logic.
>
> Whether something is or isn't a "given" is something that
> requires logical argument, not just bald assertion.
<Sigh>
The original question was about a term that might describe code that is elegant, efficient, and tight.
At some point, we got into the definitions of the terms, and I commented on their usage by the CS professors and professionals I've known, among whom compilation and operation of a solution are assumed: they wouldn't even be considering code that wouldn't compile or that didn't work correctly.
HTML Indexer 4 is still the easiest way to create and maintain indexes
for web sites, intranets, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and other HTML documents.
HTML Indexer 4 includes fully integrated cross-references, target frames
and windows, multiple-file output, "one-step accept" of default entries,
and more!
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.