TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Reviewiing Process with 12 Engineers at Once From:"Dan Glovier" <dglovier -at- edline -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:49:17 -0500
Lynn is right on with this hint.
> In our fiction critique group, one of the up-front rules is that
copyedit
> comments are to be written on the manuscript and not discussed (unless
> they're particularly hilarious/embarrassing, or -seriously- affected
the
> reader's understanding of the text). This allows the critiquer to
focus
> their comments on whatever issues they feel are worth discussing. No
> reason
> why that same rule can't apply in this situation.
Many SMEs feel they need to actually edit the doc, and have made some
fabulously funny grammatical suggestions. Bless their little hearts for
trying...
With this caveat, the SMEs no longer feel that their role is to play
copyeditor, and we can then move on to more productive issues. Everyone
wins.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.