RE: Kat Nagel's "Life Cycle of Mailing Lists"
I don't find this list very harsh...
want harsh? talk to traditional dog trainers and mention clickers...
<nod, nod>
Or talk to an Early Music devotee and mention countertenors and vibrato in the same sentence <shudder>. That comment (and one of the biting replies that happened to be phrased as a limerick) was what triggered the Rubbish! war that prompted my 1994 post.
TECHWR-L at its very worst has NEVER been that nasty and brutish.
K@
loyal member of both lists for a very long time
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ANNOUNCING ROBOHELP STUDIO
RoboHelp Studio maximizes your Help authoring power by combining RoboHelp Office and RoboDemo, so you can easily create professional Help systems that feature interactive tutorials and demos.
Find out more about RoboHelp Studio at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
References:
RE: Kat Nagel's "Life Cycle of Mailing Lists": From: Foster, Willow
Previous by Author:
Re: Kat Nagel's "Life Cycle of Mailing Lists"
Next by Author:
RE: Velcro or "hook and loop"
Previous by Thread:
RE: Kat Nagel's "Life Cycle of Mailing Lists"
Next by Thread:
RE: Kat Nagel's "Life Cycle of Mailing Lists"
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads