TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Notifying for Reviews and Routing approvals From:John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L (E-mail)" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:30:06 -0400
Hi, guys...my boss asked me for a "serious" proposal yesterday.
Right now, anyone in any department can create a document. That document
will describe something, and most often, will refer to some interaction with
another system. There is no procedure of getting an approval from a
representative of the other system. So, what happens, is that stuff is
written about other systems and the facts are not verified.
We're looking at some means of sending out a notice to a representative from
each system, where they need to access the document and either sign off on
their part, or submit changes/correction/comments/etc.
It would be nice if the system functioned as part of Outlook, in that way,
all Outlook features could be incorporated and the addresses would be part
of the Outlook member list.
If not that way, I'm looking at a model such as what we use for bug
tracking. An entry is made and it is assigned to someone. They get an email,
click a link, do whatever it is that the item asks, then enter comments and
either click the resolve button or assign it to the next person. The only
problem I have with what we use (FogBugz), is that you can only assign one
person at a time and I see where multiple assignees will be needed since a
document can refer to multiple other systems.
Anyone using a system that resembles what I'm talking about?
John Posada, Senior Technical Writer
Barnes&Noble.com
"If you're afraid to be second-guessed, you better not make any decisions."
--Hal Sutton, America's 2004 Ryder Cup Captain
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be
CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM
DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named
herein. If you
are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and
take the
steps necessary to delete the message completely from your computer system.
Not Intended as a Substitute for a Writing: Notwithstanding the Uniform
Electronic Transaction
Act or any other law of similar effect, absent an express statement to the
contrary, this e-mail message, its contents, and any attachments hereto are
not intended to
represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not
otherwise intended
to bind this sender, barnesandnoble.com llc, barnesandnoble.com inc. or any
other
person or entity.