[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Indexing style refs

Subject: Re: Indexing style refs
From: dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 12:06:25 -0700

John Posada wrote:


I thought I was talking to the wall.

Apparently you were.

No one has advocated the kind of nonsense suggested in these so-called examples that supposedly prove your point. We're talking about *reasonable* expectations, here.

Perhaps you've received some negative feedback on an index. If so, move on (whether it was justified or not). As an indexer you're responsible for including all the *reasonabale* synonyms, so your readers can find the information they need.

If you don't want to bother or don't have time, turn to the professionals--they'll probably do a better job, and they won't whine about it.

--David
========================================================================

HTML Indexer 4 is still the easiest way to create and maintain indexes for web sites, intranets, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and other HTML documents.

HTML Indexer 4 includes fully integrated cross-references, target frames and windows, multiple-file output, "one-step accept" of default entries, and more!

http://www.html-indexer.com/






References:
RE: Indexing style refs: From: John Posada

Previous by Author: Re: Indexing style refs
Next by Author: Re: Indexing style refs
Previous by Thread: RE: Indexing style refs
Next by Thread: RE: Indexing style refs

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads