[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers? (2)

Subject: Re: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers? (2)
From: JX <techwrl-list-only -at- doitall -dot- com>
To: Dick Margulis <margulis -at- fiam -dot- net>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:49:13 -0400

> Yes, there is a genuine benefit to telling the reader that the thing to
> look for on the referenced page is a table or a figure rather than a
> subhead or a paragraph topic.

My question was whether to omit the number, not the type of thing.

For instance

For details, see Table 12, "Required Database Fields" on page 72.
Or
For details, see the table "Required Database Fields" on page 72.

Does the number provide a genuine benefit?

-- JX




Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers?: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers?
Next by Author: Re: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers? (3)
Previous by Thread: Re: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers?
Next by Thread: Re: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers? (2)

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads