TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I'm not going to enter into this debate (which frequently degenerates
into the "us" versus "them"), but I did want to provide a counter-point
to Curtis' post regarding job prospects for PhDs in Tech Comm in
academia. The job market for PhDs in tech comm is very good, with most
grads having multiple good offers for tenure-track positions. (There's
been a growing concern about the number of relatively unqualified
entrants into the field who are hired because programs are desperate to
make hires. So the demand is a double-edged sword.)
And although salaries are not exceptionally high, they're moving upward
quickly. In somewhat formal surveys I've run over the last three years,
I anticipate this year average starting salaries for new PhDs in tech
comm who take tenure-track positions will be in the low- to mid-$50k
range. This isn't great pay, but it's substantially above the average
for colleagues in English Departments where many of tech comm programs
are housed. The workload isn't exactly light, but there's freedom to
define research interests (and time to do research) not found at many
industrial sites.
So while the pool of jobs available for academic tech comm is much
smaller than for industrial tech comm, the number of applicants looking
for jobs in that pool is *extremely* small. I say this having been on
hiring committees and having gone on the market myself during the last
three years. (I can already hear someone saying, "Well, programs must
be desperate if *he* got a job.")
- Johndan
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 02:03 AM, TECHWR-L digest wrote:
Subject: Re: PHD in Tech writing and biomed
From: "Brautigam, Curtis" <cubrautiga -at- state -dot- pa -dot- us>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:01:03 -0400
X-Message-Number: 6
[...]
Of course, the downside to
this is that the academic job market as a whole is far worse than the
technical writing job market, and the opportunities in doing
theoretical
research in technical communications are few and far between. I