TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Word and multiple conditions (a cutting edge skill?)
Subject:RE: Word and multiple conditions (a cutting edge skill?) From:MList -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:31:04 -0400
John Posada [mailto:JPosada -at- book -dot- com] thought he had me with:
[PHB responds with...]
> >"Interesting idea. Let me know when you have the first
> >draft ready for my review...."
> >
> >I've used that tactic myself.
>
> So, of course, since you know that will happen, you've
> prepared it ahead of
> time and when he asks, you whip it out and hand it to him right there,
> right?
Nope. What I do is what I said in the next paragraph of
my post, which you deleted:
"I just have to arrange that the suggestion come from other
quarters. I don't want to 'get any on me'."
Y'see, the problem is that I don't really think that
what they want can be done with the tool, at least not
in a reasonable and efficient manner. (The responses that
I'm getting so far would indicate that Word is not the
tool for the job, at least not without add-on tools.)
The options are:
a) prove to PHB that what they want will work
b) prove to PHB that what they want will not work.
You may recall that it can be difficult or impossible to
prove the negative of a proposition (a favorite tactic
of lawyers and debaters is to put the opponent in the
position of having to prove the not of an assertion).
So, if I fail to keep myself free of the contagion,
I can do a whole mess of work (when my schedule does
not really permit, thank you) just to show that something
I don't think is worthwhile or efficiently do-able is ... do-able.
Or, I can do enough to show that it is not a workable
approach.... and then be regarded as lazy or obstructive
for not having put enough effort into *making* it work.
A person with a pet project, that they don't have to
implement themselves, is not easily persuaded that it
wasn't a good idea. Instead, failure to show that it
IS a good idea becomes failure on the part of the underling
who was tasked to demonstrate the wonderfulness.
On balance, I think I'd prefer that somebody else be in
that position.
NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.