RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization

Subject: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization
From: "Land, Julia" <Julia_Land -at- bmc -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:20:23 -0500


Mark Baker Said:

> It is often valuable to normalize your content.

What does it mean to normalize content?

Thanks,

Julia




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Locking headings in MS Word
Next by Author: Re: Prolegomenon vs. Preface
Previous by Thread: Re: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Next by Thread: FW: Single sourcing vs. normalization


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads