RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization

Subject: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization
From: <Daniel_Hall -at- trendmicro -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:17:49 -0700


Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-129804 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-129804 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Bill Burns
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:14 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization



I'm sure that Mark wasn't expecting the Spanish Inquisition when he brought up this topic.

Bill Burns
Documentation Supervisor/MS Help MVP
Quality Design Systems
bburns -at- qds-solutions -dot- com


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Next by Author: Microsoft vs. Eolas and its impact on techwr-lers
Previous by Thread: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Next by Thread: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads