Re: Leaving Techwhirlers

Subject: Re: Leaving Techwhirlers
From: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- oddpost -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:44:51 -0700 (PDT)


Didn't I read somewhere (like Microsoft's website!) that the original patch didn't work? And that they issued a *new* patch to fix their *old* patch last week?

Or was that for a different security hole?

David

-----Original Message from Goober Writer <gooberwriter -at- yahoo -dot- com>-----

> Or, your rule could be "forward to
> support -at- microsoft -dot- com". Maybe then they
> would do something...

They did do something. This worm exploits a hole that
was patched months ago. If you're infected, it's your
own damn fault.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Numbering in Procedures
Next by Author: Re: Indexing- Best Practices
Previous by Thread: Re: Leaving Techwhirlers
Next by Thread: Re: Leaving Techwhirlers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads