Re: Indexing- Best Practices
Two levels is great, but it looks as though R&B's alphabetizing ignores elements like "to" and "as". That would be tricky to do in systems like Framemaker.
No, that wouldn't be tricky at all in FrameMaker: You can provide sorting instructions with each entry, like so: "EGGS AND EGG DISHES:whites, to fold[EGGS AND EGG DISHES:whites, fold]".
Now you might call that tedious (with which I wouldn't agree, the system is really easy to use), but it certainly is not tricky.
I sit corrected. It is not tricky -- but it is tedious beyond belief.
Does anyone know whether IXgen offers any relief for this tedium?
--
Guy K. Haas
guy -at- hiskeyboard -dot- com | gkhaas -at- usa -dot- net
http://swexegete.typepad.com/GuysBlog
Software Exegete in Silicon Valley
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
References:
Re: Indexing- Best Practices: From: Jan Henning
Previous by Author:
Re: Indexing- Best Practices
Next by Author:
RE: DB app recommendations
Previous by Thread:
Re: Indexing- Best Practices
Next by Thread:
Farewell
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads