Re: Content vs. design: orphans
Your graphic designer is incorrect on a couple of counts. Long answer below.
[Dick's excellent long answer omitted.]
Dick likely remembers linotype machines and maybe hand-set type. The guys
who did that work were the final gods of authority on what went into
print. To control widows and orphans they would simply omit words. They
felt that the authors never noticed. We should be thankful that we now
have a bit more control of content.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for
competitive pricing or view a live demo at: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Content vs. design: orphans, Dick Margulis
References:
Content vs. design: orphans: From: Dianna Bearce
Re: Content vs. design: orphans: From: Dick Margulis
Previous by Author:
Re: Auto-clearing the cache (WAS Stupid users)
Next by Author:
Re: Estimation of Timelines for Documentation Projects
Previous by Thread:
Re: Content vs. design: orphans
Next by Thread:
Re: Content vs. design: orphans
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads