Re: credibility (longish but IMO worth reading)
Goober Writer wrote:
If someone with your skills and know-how needs to
trade money for credibility, then there is something
tragically wrong with our profession.
There is. We have been venting about it for years on this very list.
Employers either neglect documentation work or hold it in active contempt.
Employers don't understand documentation work, and documentation doesn't
appear on their radar screen unless painfully forced by a customer. Rational
business priorities, or pathological arrogance? After all this time I still
don't know. Depends on the employer, I guess.
[rest of Mike O's good stuff omitted]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for
competitive pricing or view a live demo at: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Previous by Author:
Re: Estimation of Timelines for Documentation Projects
Next by Author:
Re: Tech writer job description needed
Previous by Thread:
Re: credibility (longish but IMO worth reading)
Next by Thread:
RE: credibility (longish but IMO worth reading)
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads