TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Fear of certification? From:nancy -dot- bush -at- insurity -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:48:43 -0500
Like licensing and advanced degrees--trust in the label does not preclude
inexcusable haircuts, medical malpractice, or incompetent PhDs.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hart, Geoff [mailto:Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:31 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Fear of certification?
I have many objections to certification, and doubly so when the motive
driving it is "to get some respect". Unfortunately, respect has to be earned
on the job, with your colleagues, not by obtaining a few more letters after
one's name. If we can't demonstrate our value and that of our profession to
our employer, a certification process won't do that for us.
Editors and translators have been certified for years, and I've yet to see
any major payoff from the certification process: employers generally aren't
aware of the certificates and don't use them for screening purposes, and
people who have earned the certificates don't enjoy better job security or
higher earnings. Moreover, I've personally known a distressing number of
certified incompetents--not to mention highly competent professionals with
great credentials who have the ethics of vampires. ("Enron" anyone?) A
certification is no guarantee of competence, nor is the lack of
certification any indication of incompetence.
While I certainly agree with the value of screening out the incompetents,
that's only going to work if employers are aware of the certification
process, respect it, and use it to help them find qualified workers. If most
employers only care about the bottom line and don't understand how we
contribute to it (cf the "outsourcing to India" furor), and there's no
statutory requirement to hire certified writers (as there is for engineers
and doctors), certification becomes an academic exercise in
self-congratulation that accomplishes nothing.
Let's spend our efforts where they have a chance for some payback:
demonstrating that we have a profession, that our efforts add value, and
that it pays to hire a professional. Once we've accomplished that, _then_ it
makes sense to develop a certification program.
--Geoff Hart, geoff-h@ mtl.feric.ca
(try ghart@ videotron.ca if you get no response)
Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada
580 boul. St-Jean
Pointe-Claire, Que., H9R 3J9 Canada
"Wisdom is one of the few things that look bigger the further away it
is."--Terry Pratchett
RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for
competitive pricing or download a trial at: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l4
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
