Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting

Subject: Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting
From: lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:15:49 -0500


Michele Davis writes:


Only check email every 10 minutes and keep your responses short (if you're a slower typer). Me, eh, 120 wpm,

I once did a typing test. After they subtracted all the errors, my score was 13 wpm. No wonder I'm not getting anything done!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lyndsey Amott
www.docsymmetry.com
Winnipeg, MB R3G 2J3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER TRIAL NOW AVAILABLE!

RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web. The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for competitive pricing or download a trial at: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l4

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
TECHWRLing vs. techwriting: From: lyndsey . amott
Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting: From: Michele Davis

Previous by Author: Re: Caring about good writing...
Next by Author: Re: Word, Macros and Tool Tips
Previous by Thread: Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting
Next by Thread: RE: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads