[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word

Subject: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
From: dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com
To: Techwr-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:00:43 -0800

lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com wrote:


As several list members have pointed out, do not use Word's autonumbering feature; rather, use the LISTNUM field.

The SEQ field provides a dependable mechanism that's well documented (by me and others) in the Techwr-L archives.

--David

=========================================================================

A V A I L A B L E N O W ! http://www.html-indexer.com/

HTML Indexer is still the easiest way to create and maintain real indexes
for web sites, intranets, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and other HTML documents.







References:
RE: Quark & Frame vs. Word: From: John Posada
Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word: From: lyndsey . amott

Previous by Author: Re: Can you recommend a search tool we could attach to our html d ocumentation?
Next by Author: Re: Online help and the elimination of the printed doc
Previous by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Next by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads