[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: About mil/heavy industries documentation standards (long)

Subject: Re: About mil/heavy industries documentation standards (long)
From: Dick Margulis <margulis -at- fiam -dot- net>
To: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:16:26 -0500



eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com wrote:



Conclusion:
Good looking documents are only an improvement once the information is correct, complete, and well organised. Only then should font size become a preoccupation.


There's that ol' strawman, again, even if it isn't coming from the person who usually brings it up.

Nobody, not one single person who participates in techwr-l, has _ever,_ to my knowlege, suggested that design is _more_ important than correct, complete, well organized information.

The discussion here is about a standard and whether the standard would be improved by making it more complete.

So what are we arguing about?

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at mail.fiam.net]




References:
RE: About mil/heavy industries documentation standards (long): From: eric . dunn

Previous by Author: Re: About mil/heavy industries documentation standards (long)
Next by Author: Re: Editing .pdfs - Continued
Previous by Thread: RE: About mil/heavy industries documentation standards (long)
Next by Thread: RE: RE: About mil/heavy industries documentation standards (long)

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads