Business Model Reality Check

Subject: Business Model Reality Check
From: "Kathryn \"Kate\" Kaminski" <oudeis -at- tampabay -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 11:57:51 -0400


Hi,

I am in _desperate_ need of a reality check. The owner of our very small company currently makes money selling our services, mine and hers. My relationship to her is somewhat like that of sub-contractor to contractor. With the profits from selling our services, she's been funding the development of a product/service that would eventually be the basis for the company. In the meantime, though, our operating funds depend on keeping current clients. Given that you should plan on five years before you see a profit on a new venture, we need to continue to cultivate more clients. Attrition happens.

Here's the new model:

The idea is to offer inexpensive non-credentialed soft skill courses to the general public, as well as people interested in building their professional skills. We'd take our training materials and turn them into courses in the field that we know best.

We'd also reach out to SMEs, beginning with our colleagues. There is an incredibly tiny sales budget. The web site for the courses and word of mouth are supposed to be the major sales methods. (PLEASE: I know the "field of dreams" approach failed. :)

Friend SME decides to offer a course on "Font Fondling for Techwriters" or "How to Become a Contractor" or "Grow Mushrooms in your Garage." Friend SME uses materials she already has, such as a Power Point presentation, and adds test questions. Alternatively, she can build from scratch. A proprietary tool turns the PPT into an on-line course. There's no quality control over other SME courses, so no labor cost there. Cost is in hosting courses, collecting money (PayPal), and disbursing money to the authors.

Friend SME would receive 25% of gross. Courses cost $2-5 each. If Friend SME's time is worth $30/hr and if it takes 50 hrs to develop a one hour course, then at:

$2.00/course she' have to sell 3000 courses.
$3.00/course, she'd have to sell 2000 courses.

Even if I low ball it and say it'll take 25 hrs, that'd still require some decent site traffic. What have I heard, 1-2% of site visitors actually buy something?

I know that my employer sees $ coming in for little work on her part. But, you have to make sure you get authors to write more courses and you have to get traffic to the site and make sure they BUY. I don't see the market? I might be blind?!

1. As far as I can tell, there is nothing to guarantee an author that the gross sales ARE indeed the gross sales. How do I know that, in the last quarter, my course was sold 25 times?

2. With no sales budget, what drives learners to the site? Its existence on Google, apparently? We've recently discussed the "joy" of getting Googled. So, that does take some work and it takes time. I think the other answer I rec'd suggested that the authors friends would come to the site, take the course (out of curiosity, professional courtesy, etc.) and say to themselves, "Wow! I could do this. (Maybe I can do it better than this cat!) Let me in on this deal."

3. You get what you pay for. 'Nuff said? Or am I wrong?

4. Why would I take one of these courses, if I can learn the same thing for free? Why would I want to expose my credit card # for $2.00 at a site that has no established reputation? PayPal has been mentioned, so that's an option. I won't use PayPal, myself.

5. Would professionals take soft skills courses from a "university" that has no formal credentials? Would anyone be impressed with a resume that said you'd taken a course in "Project Management for Dummies" at a non-credentialed site?

6. Personally, I would want more quality assurance. If someone takes a course that is awful, why would they take more or encourage others to take more?

I'm in desperate need of a reality check. Beat me over the head and tell me I'm wrong and why. Tell me what holes you see. Would you do this? Or something in between. I am putting on my flame-protective gear after I click send.

Geez! The groupthink on this one is so overwhelming that I'm starting to feel like I'm nuts for pointing out holes. Indeed, I've pretty much kept my counsel on this one, which isn't what I normally do, but it seems best in this situation. Also, from what I see happening now, the company isn't spending enough time on its current business model. If we lose another client without making sure we have more in the pipeline, I don't see how she's going to make it. It takes 5 years to turn a profit on a new venture, and we've also put two years into development. Were I a business owner, I'd want to recoup most of that investment.

Thanks so much for your thoughts.

Kate


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Vertical Ellipsis in Word?
Next by Author: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Previous by Thread: RE: Printer
Next by Thread: Re: Business Model Reality Check


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads