TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Single Spacing, Double Spacing, and Doing It Ones Own Way
Subject:Single Spacing, Double Spacing, and Doing It Ones Own Way From:"Wright, Lynne" <lwright -at- positron911 -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 10 May 2004 15:14:06 -0400
As someone who spent a decade working as a typesetter, I can confirm that
the double space after a period convention went out of fashion when people
stopped using typewriters. Because letters were put on the page
mechanically, each character took up the same amount of horizontal space, so
a double-space was used after a period to help visually define the end of
sentences within a paragraph.
These days, with sophisticated electronic fonts in which you can control the
kerning and word-spacing, an extra space after a period is just not
necessary or useful... which is why the convention is for single-spacing.
Plus, isn't it possible that if an automatic line break happens after the
first space, the next line will start with the second space, so the line
will be indented slightly?
Anybody who really knows type and publication design will always advocate
the most economical and tight letter-kerning and word-spacing possible... in
other words, the modern, professional look is for tight as opposed to loose
spacing. So I'd say that for a Web page, you ought to use the modern
standard, not one that went out with the horse and buggy.
I must say that I had a problem with your comment about following your own
judgment if the convention "seems" wrong. I get that all the time from the
writers i work with, and it drives me nuts, because when they argue against
adopting a new standard because it just doesn't "seem" right to them, what's
happening is that they are just afraid of things that aren't familiar to
them. They'd rather keep doing things the way they always have, even if its
wrong by industry standards. They are incapable of even approaching the
question of whether or not the change is for the better. I know this is
true, because they are never able to provide a credible reason why their
preference is any better than the whims of a monkey.
My point is: conventions become conventions because the general body of
learned wisdom has determined that there is an optimal way to do something.
So why reject that? On the other hand, this issue IS really trivial... most
people don't have a discerning enough eye to even notice how much space
there is after a period.
Lynne Wright
Technical Communications
Positron Inc.
5101 Buchan St. H4P 2R9
(514) 345-2200
fax: 345-2272
SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.