RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

Subject: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
From: "Bill Lawrence" <scribe -at- matrixplus -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 08:50:50 -0400


Chris,

Forgive me for not understanding the complexity of legislation.

Two questions:

1) Before these folks had WYSIWYG systems, how was it done?

2) How did they learn to deal with computers in general and a WYSIWYG
system in particular?

My guess is that they have already gone though a significant paradigm
shift (and survived).

Yes, you are missing a vital point. In general, typography, layout, and
design have always been used to communicate semantics. However, those
semantic relationships are only obvious to people. Sometimes, such as
apparently is the case with legislation, those semantics are only
obvious to a trained few. Creating rules to process the visual semantics
into a form that's easily read and understood by programs is a pretty
tough proposition. I used to write programs in Perl and Omnimark to do
just that sort of thing from word processor files. It's nasty and never
100% right.

It's also quite possible to create an editing application that does the
translation from the visual cues put in by the authors in a WYSIWYG
environment to XML. Programs such as Epic and Xmetal have scripting
capabilities that allow for that, albeit with a very large effort.
Maybe that's a great solution for your application (and it would be a
very lucrative consulting gig).

My original question was aimed not at legislators, but at technical
writers. We're supposed to be a trifle more flexible than senators, and
perhaps it's a little easier for us to shift our paradigms.

Bill


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???: From: Chris Despopoulos

Previous by Author: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Author: RE: Semantic markup for tabular data
Previous by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: Re: Why WYSIWYG for XML???


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads