TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Standardizing on XML? (Was: Re: Why WYSIWYG for XML???)
Subject:Standardizing on XML? (Was: Re: Why WYSIWYG for XML???) From:Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Sat, 22 May 2004 07:15:48 -0400
Bruce Byfield, quoting Chris Despopoulos ("I would like to see XML as
the format for a significant portion of all the text that is now
created"), wondered: <<Would you mind holding forth on your reasons?>>
I won't speak for Chris, but I see this as both wonderful idea and a
complete disaster. The wonderful part: Any GML, including XML, can
constrain how badly users can mangle the text. A well-implemented XML
structure*, with a user-friendly interface, would prevent users from
committing some of the formatting atrocities they routinely commit and
actually help them write better or at least force them to learn to use
styles properly. As a freelance editor, this would eliminate hours of
reformatting some weeks.
* Do you trust Microsoft to do this right in fewer than 3 tries? I work
mostly in Word to cope with client files, and I sure don't trust 'em.
<<What do you think the rewards of switching are to the average
writer?>>
That's the "complete disaster" part. The average writer (office
workers, research scientists, engineers, etc. rather than technical
writers) can't use even the simple style features that already exist.
If constrained by a DTD or even by simple format validation, most would
come up with even more horrific things to do with styles* than they
already do rather than trying to learn the new features.
* Such as applying whatever style tag the DTD suggests (i.e., the tag
permitted by the DTD at a given position) rather than thinking about
the semantics long enough to select the correct tag. For example, you'd
be amazed at how many bulleted lists I see that are created by manually
typing bullet characters and tabs rather than selecting the bullet
style from the template.
--Geoff Hart ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca
(try geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com if you don't get a reply)
SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.