TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Word vs. Frame From:"Goldstein, Dan" <DGoldstein -at- DeusTech -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 24 May 2004 09:23:12 -0400
Hi Suzette,
The Master Documents function in Word is still unstable.
On the other hand, Robbie Cooper wrote in February in TECHWR-L: "I have
created large technical documents (1000+ pages), replete with numerous
graphics, large tables, and auto-generated tables and indices with MS Word."
Robbie follows this statement with helpful hints for successfully working
with large documents in Word. See http://tinyurl.com/29hzl
IME, Word 2K handles large documents better than Word XP (2002). Haven't
tried Word 2003 yet. And (IME) if they say "Word," you should say, "GB of
RAM."
And who's "Glacier"?
Dan Goldstein
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suzette Leeming
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 8:53 AM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Word vs. Frame
>
> GlacierI have searched everywhere, and cannot find a recent
> comparison of MS
> Word (2000) and FrameMaker (at least 6.0). The most recent
> one I can find is
> Alex Ragen's comparison from 2000. I hoping that someone may
> have created a
> comparison in a table-like format.
>
> The company I work for has decided it is time to revisit the
> tool we use to
> create our documentation. The problem is, I am absolutely in love with
> FrameMaker and can't imagine going back to Word. Our manuals
> can be quite
> large, with multi-chapters, conditional text, etc. and my
> experience has
> been that Master Documents in Word is still unstable.
>
> Has anybody completed a comparison chart like this that they would be
> willing to share with me? I know I am biased, so probably not the best
> person to complete a comparison such as this.
SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.