TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Word vs. Frame From:"T. Word Smith" <techwordsmith -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 25 May 2004 05:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
I would guess her employer and bosses, like so many
others, want people other than the technical writers
to work in the source files developing content.
--- "Goldstein, Dan" <DGoldstein -at- DeusTech -dot- com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > ...Word is not part of the solution, it is STILL
> part of the problem.
> > You know you can also program using notepad. But
> why on earth would
> > you want to limit yourself by using an inadequate
> tool?...
>
> Unless Suzette tells us "why on earth" her company
> is considering Word, we
> can only guess.
>
> There are certain advantages to using an application
> that almost the entire
> business world uses. This list has already seen a
> post from a skilled writer
> who threw his company into a tizzy when he left,
> taking with him the
> company's sole knowledge of FrameMaker.
I missed that post. HOWEVER, what happened to the
"retention" part of "recruitment and retention"? I
mean, treat your people like crud and they leave. Even
if that author were using Word, with perhaps some VBA
macros, intimate knowledge of template, styles, solid
knowledge of the subject, understanding of the content
and content types that go into the docs, when and
where ... even if that author used Word, the company
loses when the author leaves. Period.
Hiring somebody costs money. Over time, that person
becomes more tuned and more valuable to the
organization ... so why not actively "retain" them?
And, FrameMaker experience is really not that rare, is
it?
> This is not to say that Word is "better." However,
> it is possible that
> intelligent managers who care about good
> documentation can still make a
> well-considered business decision to choose Word
> over FrameMaker for their
> particular needs.
Maybe. I've done 500-page docs in Word that went to
press ... lots of graphics, lists, etc. It took a lot
longer and required a lot more rework than FrameMaker,
but it can be done. Ain't no such thing as perfect
software, you try to go with the software that best
meets your needs ....
My two cents, anyway.
=====
T.
"Money makes the world go 'round is an incomplete statement; money is the fuel, and stupidity is the short bus that burns it." (Bill Swallow-02/04)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.