Re: Longhorn - Tech writing changes

Subject: Re: Longhorn - Tech writing changes
From: "T.W. Smith" <techwordsmith -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 09:46:49 -0400


Clearly, they didn't need that documentation because studies showed
nobody used it.

<g>

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:33:50 -0400, Mike O. <obie1121 -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> AFAIK
> there are still lots of critical functions in the NT API that remain
> undocumented. And they never did publish a decent doc on the Word object
> model.
>
> Mike O.

======
T.

Remember, this is online. Take everything with a mine of salt and a grin.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Next by Author: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Previous by Thread: Re: Longhorn - Tech writing changes
Next by Thread: RE: Longhorn - Tech writing changes


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads