TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Steven Goldstein wonders: <<My company manufactures products that are
sold internationally and installed through a dealer network. These
dealers have technicians on staff that are responsible for installing
and maintaining my company's products. Therefore, my customers are the
dealers and technicians, not the end-users who own my company's
products.>>
One thing you didn't mention is whether the techs are responsible for
training their customers. If not, that's a large part of your problem
right there: "teach a user to fish", and all that. Point out to your
dealer network that such training is a value-added service (whether
free, as a gesture to earn customer goodwill, or paid, for a nominal
fee that covers the dealer's costs), and is provided by many other
product vendors in other industries. The more expensive the product,
the easier it is to justify a day of training as part of the cost.
Educating the users should quickly reduce the support burden,
particularly if your company compiles a list of frequently asked
questions from your customers and uses those questions to inform the
design of the training package. Incidentally, your company can also
sell this training package to the 1500 dealers you mentioned for more
than enough to cover the development costs and thereby turn the problem
into a profit center. Of course, in an ideal world, you'd use the
customer problems to design a better product and minimize tech. support
costs that way...
<<Quite simply, the need is to reduce calls coming into Tech Support,
and to reduce the duration of the calls that do come into Tech
Support.>>
To reduce the need, you can do two things: In the long term, you can
redesign the products to be sufficiently usable that support calls
decrease greatly in frequency. In the short term, you can reduce the
duration of the calls by developing some form of knowledgebase that
provides fast, effective access to the answers to the most common
questions, and slower but no less effective access to the less-common
answers.
<<I will be teaching my technical writing peers how to document an
analytical troubleshooting approach that will get the technicians to
the root cause of the problem more quickly, with less confusion. This
will result in fewer calls to Tech Support. Also, Tech Support will use
these new troubleshooting procedures to handle calls that do come in,
which will help them reduce the duration of the call.>>
Good start. Depending on the nature of your product, you may also want
to make these guides available to the users of the product via your
documentatoin. At a minimum, give these people access to
troubleshooting information that helps them solve the problems they can
easily solve by themselves, but that also clearly indicates when they
shouldn't try and should instead call a technician.
<<My customers (the technicians) don't have Internet access when
they're on the road, so he wants me to do something like provide all of
our product literature (mostly PDF format, and there's a lot of it) on
CD-ROM, with an easily navigable user interface so that the technicians
can find the documentation they're looking for easily.>>
A better solution is to set up a synchronization system such that when
the techs return to the office, they can quickly and easily download
the latest solution set to their PDA or laptop. This way, there are no
CDs involved (no production and distribution costs), and the support
material is as up to date as the technician wants it to be. This
approach has become a standard for many companies with large numbers of
sales staff (insurance, pharmaceuticals, etc.).
How to synchronize? That's beyond my expertise, but software is
certainly available for "managed PCs" (check out the archives at
www.pcmag.com) that lets the network manager automatically install
software on all PCs on the network. You can probably license such
software inexpensively from the developer (most major PC manufacturers)
if you can't develop your own solution.
<<I could create an online help project, which would provide the
navigation system that allows the technicians to easily find the
product documentation they need (I currently author help using RoboHelp
X5). But this documentation is constantly being updated, and new
documentation is constantly being added to the collection.>>
A "help" project strikes me as a suboptimal approach. Most help files
are designed for integration with software, and although they work just
fine as standalone applications, they're arguably less efficient than a
simpler Web-based design using straight HTML. The main advantage of an
HTML approach is that you can create new topics and update old topics
without having to recompile the whole help project, and can easily
publish the support material on your Web site as a knowledgebase. When
installed on a tech's laptop, the tech need only download a few new or
changed pages rather than an entire help file. But if the tech is on
the road, they can also download the latest update directly from your
Web site rather than having to return to the office.
<<[automatic updates] If this is possible, then I might only have to
send 1,500 CD-ROMs to the technicians once (to install the first
release of the documentation, plus to install the auto-update
software).>>
That's a big time and cost saving on your end, and thus, well worth
recommending.
--Geoff Hart ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca
(try geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com if you don't get a reply)
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.