Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)
What do you mean?
I mean this:
It is the STC, with all its baggage that I think would be disastrous for Techwr-l. If a new organization that included STC members took over Techwr-l, I personally wouldn't object, so long as they didn't try to associate it with the STC... STC control of the list would be just as exclusionary. The only difference would be the people excluded.
The only person I've seen talking about being exclusionary is you.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...), Bruce Byfield
References:
Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...): From: Steven Jong
Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...): From: Bruce Byfield
Previous by Author:
Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)
Next by Author:
Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)
Previous by Thread:
RE: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)
Next by Thread:
Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads