Re: Editors and writers; was: Re: job title nomenclature on biz cards

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

You're absolutely right, of course, but even the best writer (and the
writer in this case was, in fact, one of the best I've ever worked with)
will occaisionally miss something.  A second set of eyes is good 
insurance, and the more knowledge there is behind those eyes, the
better.  

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <written_by -at- juno -dot- com>
> It seems to me that the writer should have proofread the document before
> the editor got a hold of it. Or am I wrong? 



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.