TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Transition from employee to consultant--any gotchas?
Subject:Re: Transition from employee to consultant--any gotchas? From:MaggiRos <maggiros -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
I once got a lump sum severance from a Major Entertainment
Company who was not goign out of business, but had moved
most of a project to Europe without me. (They were not big
believers in using contractors, back then.) They laid me
and a lot of people off for lack of work. Nice severance
package, and a good thing, because I was then out of work
for quite a while. It did not impact my ability to get
unemployment (California), I presume because it was all one
check.
More recently, the company I worked for was radically
downsizing, selling off parts of the business, etc, and
laying of a lot of people. What we got was 8 weeks of
continued salary, just as if we were still working, but
without the tedium of coming in to the office when there
was no work to do. (This was, I believe, based on that
Federal big-plant-closing ruling that says they can't just
shut down and put everyone on the streets without notice.
The lay-off was big enough to qualify.)
But that wasn't severance. It was salary. Our official
termination date was when that 8-week notification period
ran out. *Then* we each got a severance check based on the
number of years of service, plus back vacation/sick pay,
etc. Up till then, we couldn't collect unemployment because
we weren't unemployed. After that--severance isn't salary.
And the checks were good, right down to the last penny.
Maggie
--- peemo -at- hotmail -dot- com wrote:
>
> Dood wrote:
> > Severence does not prevent you from getting
> unemployment.
>
> Dood, the laws must be different wherever you live. It
> does indeed
> prevent it--at least here in the Midwest. That is in all
> the instances I
> know where the payments were made over the course of
> several weeks or
> months. Unemployment did not kick in until two weeks
> after the last
> severence payment.
>
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.