TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
L, good for you for taking a stand. And "amen" to everything you say.
-----Original Message-----
From: L. [mailto:beantown_tw -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 7:12 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Previous employer contacts
It is interesting that this subject has arisen
precisely now. Just last night I sent an email
declining the opportunity to interview for a TW
position at a major pharmaceutical company in Boston
for these very reasons.
After a brief phone conversation, the interview was
scheduled, and they sent me an email containing a link
to an online application form located on the
"Application Station." (Apparently a commercial site
that provides these services to corporations.)
SSN was a required field to successfully complete the
online application. They also demanded to perform drug
testing, a full criminal records check, educational
achievement check, and several other things that I
can't quite recall at the moment BEFORE they would
even consider you to be an official "applicant." In
my letter declining the interview, I did tell them
that I would not have a problem submitting to these
checks before beginning work--when and if they
actually selected me as their candidate of choice.
While I don't have any skeletons in my closet, I am
quite tired of corporate America thinking that they
can OWN their employees. While I have no illusions
that my declining the interview will change their
policy, I DO hope that they were shocked to find out
that I needed them LESS than they needed me.
(Something I think employers lost track of long
ago...)
I think we as individuals need to assert our right to
privacy by not giving in to these demands. I can sure
understand that the temptation would be great to give
in if I were unemployed and had mouths to feed at
home. Luckily, that's not the case for me. The only
tangible thing I've lost is the possibility of a
fairly sizable salary increase, and I am not even sure
about that.
While discussing the issue with my spouse, I mentioned
that I liken it to a pre-nuptual agreement. If you and
a company (or potential spouse) have found yourselves
to be compatible and want to protect yourselves
against potential problems, OK -- fine.
However, demanding these things together with a job
application is more like a "pre-date" (instead of
pre-nup) agreement where one has the right to demand
the return of the $$ for dinner and a movie if the
first date isn't a wild success. There's a bit of a
gamble everywhere you go these days; perhaps we should
as a society start to look back toward the PERSON
instead of the data sheet.
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
