TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:leading into a list From:"Wright, Lynne" <lwright -at- positron911 -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:05:05 -0400
Well, since you asked for it, HERE's a "thorough" answer...
For procedures, we format the intro statement ("To do whatever") as a minor
heading, and it does not take a colon.
Intro statements for bulletted (or numbered) lists take a colon, because
they are setting the reader up for a list of related statements that
essentially are continuations of the intro statement... kind of conforming
to how you'd use a colon to introduce a series of phrases if it was
structured as a run-on sentence.
But how you punctuate list entries is nuanced, because, well, why should
there ever be a simple, one-size-fits-all answer when the anal and
drunk-on-power editor can sit around and devise a very convoluted one that
confuses lesser mortals?(ps. the editor in question would be me)
So if the list entries are phrases, each entry takes a comma at the end
(xcept last one takes a period), like this:
You can use the browser to:
- Sort column entries,
- Change the order of columns,
- Center the map on an icon.
The end punctuation defines each entry as a separate phrase.
If the list entries are short items (3 or fewer words that represent
objects), the punctuation is left off, because otherwise, each line starts
looking like too cluttered with punctuation. For example...
The navigation tools are:
- Pan
- Zoom in
- Zoom out
If the list entries are complete sentences, each one takes a period at the
end, because its a complete thought, ie:
Icons indicate different validation statuses:
- A green check mark means that the address is valid.
- A black question mark means that the address has not been validated.
- A screaming demon eating a live baby means that you have descended into
hell.
The logic behind the punctuation rules is that when the list items are
longer than 3 words, the comma or period provides the reader with an extra
visual clue that they have reached the end of that point.
Now, some might say that this is redundant, since when their eye gets to the
next line, they'll see a bullet.... but in cases where points can run into
more than one full line, the punctuation cues the reader to take a mental
pause, because congratulations... you just reached the end of one of our
long-winded list items! Prepare to procede to the next point! (This is
particularly crucial in our case, because in spite of my pleading, begging,
and expounding upon every graphic design convention applied in the outside
world, i was unable to convince my colleagues that we should add a bit of
vertical space between points in a list. They insisted that a huge block of
text jammed together tightly made more sense. OY!)
I think though, that this is one of those issues for which there are many
valid permutations and theories, all of which are perfectly acceptable. Each
style maven is free to go through long, agonizing process of research,
fasting, and pleading for divine intervention to determine what works best
for them.
Personally, i also think that list entries should only take initial caps if
they are full sentences or proper nouns, but this is another case where
you've got to turn your back on the strict rules of grammar/punctuation for
the sake of peace and sanity.
Lynne Wright
Technical Communications
Positron Inc.
5101 Buchan St. H4P 2R9
(514) 345-2200
fax: 345-2272
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.