Re: Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the number of pages...

Subject: Re: Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the number of pages...
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:24:48 -0800


As a former test engineer in a previous career life, I would
dispute your generalization about testing as well as your
previous one about document pages. Testing, like documentation, is also often looked upon as a cost center
that the organization would rather not expend time and
resources on, and test engineers and managers who can
demonstrate their ability to provide statistically reliable
verification results with a minimum of impact on cost and
schedule are usually more favorably regarded than those who submit proposals requiring more.

In my experience there are *occaisional* instances where
non-writing managers may suggest pages/time period as
a *possible* metric for writer productivity, but this has
not been "the norm" in *any* writing environment I have
been involved with in the past 20 years or so (in some
cases, because I acted promptly to prevent it). If it has
been in yours, perhaps you and your colleagues have simply had the misfortune to be incompetently managed throughout your careers.

Gene Kim-Eng



"Tony Markos" <ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote...


Purposefully high page counts happen often in TW
projects. As I stated in a recent post, at a very
well attended local STC "discussion" meeting on
estimating, the almost universal consensus was that
estimating is to be based upon page count. My (sole)
attempt to challenge the sacred cow of estimating
based on page count was promptely cut off.
Gene, when the "norm" in TW estimating is estimates
based upon page count, your going to get alot of TWs
striving for high page count (in an effort to appear
productive). In such situations, if you take the time
to make it clear, concise, and user-freindly - that is
short - you are only hurting yourself.
Striving for high page counts is not a "may happen"
thing; from the TWs that I know - and I personally
know many - it very well might be a "usually happens"
thing.
FYI: This is not just a TW issue by any means. In
testing, a purposefully too-high number of test cases
is often the norm. Ditto requirements engineering. And on and on.



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 12/30/2004


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the number of pages...: From: Tony Markos
Re: Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the number of pages...: From: TechComm Dood

Previous by Author: RE: exporting Robohelp documents to Word?
Next by Author: Re: Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the number of pages...
Previous by Thread: Re: Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the number of pages...
Next by Thread: Re: Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the number of pages...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads